When John Affatati stopped at one mid-sized job shop in Jackson, they were running insert production, doing peripheral cutting and slotting in 4340 tool steel. They agreed to test a POW•R•FEED® tool against their current tool, slotting .200” long at .500” depth. Everything else was the same.
The results
- A 60% to 75% productivity increase –14-16 parts/hour vs. 8-10.
- Double tool savings – the POW•R•FEED tool cost far less than the competitor’s…and lasted nearly twice as long.
Profiles
When a customer making high-performance truck parts needed to cut cycle time and make more money (and who doesn’t), Bill Kerr came through BIG time.
Read more...
T & S Machine, a shop specializing in aerospace, medical and industrial parts, was looking for a way to reduce cycle time when machining position plates.
Read more...
“The operator was quite thrilled. They're almost exclusively IMCO users these days.”
Read more...
One of Sam Turner’s customers, like most other small job shops, was eager to cut tool costs and cycle times.
Read more...
Bill Kerr comes by his expertise in tooling and machining honestly. Before becoming a manufacturer’s representative 13 years ago (he’s based in Rockford, Michigan), Bill spent a number of years as a machinist for an aerospace manufacturer.
Read more...
One of Sam Turner’s customers, a high-end rifle manufacturer, said they were looking for better tooling to reduce cycle time. They talked to the right man.
Read more...